Striding Edge - www.stridingedge.net

Home Wainwright Fells Birkett Fells LovetheLakes Links Diary Archive Walking Diary 2010 Walking Diary 2011 Walking Diary 2012

 

 

 

Review: Salomon Cosmic 4D GTX

I have been looking forward to getting a pair of the latest Salomon Hiking Boots for ages; they seem like the real deal and herald a return to form of Salomon, an old favourite of mine. Back in the late 90's and early 2000's, Salomon boots were the ones to have and I have had a few pairs over the years, the last being the X-adventure 7's. They were fantastic boots, really comfortable and very durable and a little bit out of the ordinary compared to the other boots around at the time, so I have high expectations of the Salomon Cosmic 4D GTX boots...

The old and the new - left, Salomon X-Adventure 7's complete with mud and age - right, the Salomon Cosmic 4D GTX

I'm not sure why I have kept these old boots, I use them for occasional local dog walks but there have been a good few pairs of boots between these two pairs of Salomon's that have been consigned to the dustbin.

Initial impressions

I liked these boots straight out of the box. When I first saw them advertised I admit I was put off by the launch colour - the bright red ones seen in lots of photos. I was thankful then that there was an alternative colour and ended up getting a pair of Autobahn Black and Quick boots, which is black and grey with red bits to you and me. Visually they are very appealing and look like a pair of boots at the cutting edge of modern design should. They are also extremely lightweight (my non-scientific weigh in showed a single boot to weigh 630g compared to the X7's whopping 940g) which fits in perfectly with my current ethos of shedding unnecessary weight from my walking gear.

Boot line up: New Salomon Cosmic's , Raichle Mt Trail GTX (my current, if rather sorry looking boots) and Scarpa Manta's (my winter boots).

Features

The Cosmic's felt comfortable straight out of the box. The heel is held in firmly by the 4D advanced chassis, which borrows from their trail shoe 3D technology (4D stands for 4 layers of underfoot protection, namely the outer sole, cushioning, midsole support plate and foam insole). The main body is made of tough ballistic nylon complete with protective rubber toe and heel caps. The lacing system allows for perfect fit and comfort using 'Sensifit' which envelopes the foot (the black zigzag webbing in the lace area) and the lace lock system, something I have missed on other makes of boot and thought other manufacturers should adopt. It lets you have two different tensions on the upper and lower part of the boot and stops the laces loosening off during a walk. Waterproofing is taken care of by Gore Tex lining (of which I am a fan) and by the use of welded seams with hardly any stitching. One slight disappointment for me was that the contragrip sole was not as aggressive as the old X design, but then I guess that is all part of the lightweight technology. I expect these boots to be a great performer over the coming spring and summer months and hopefully the  should keep out the worst of the weather.

These boots are like gold dust since they appeared on - and won - the walking boot category on TV's 'The Gadget Show' and many gear shops either have none in stock or only very limited sizes.

I will update this review once I have thoroughly fell-tested them but after the first couple of outings (Brock Barrow and School Knott) I can report what I thought of them in one sentence - absolutely out of this world, astounding in fact and it was like walking in trainers but with great ankle support and the rigidity you would expect from boots.

Sean McMahon
March 2010

UPDATE 23rd April

As promised, this update is to give a further review of the Cosmic's now that I have had a chance to wear them on varying terrain. Firstly though, it was interesting to see the 3 season boot test results in Trail magazine May 2010 issue. I was astounded to see the Mammut (formerly Raichle) Mt Trail GTX to be best in test (see pic of mine above!). I am sure their test must be on a single wear as I have had nothing but problems with them and their longevity is certainly questionable. In my experience they fall to bits pretty quickly even though they are comfortable and I have had 3 pairs (I only paid for one, the others were replacements but I have given up with them now after repeated problems).

I give boots plenty of hammer as you can see from the photo of the Raichle's so obviously I can't say how long the Salomon's will last in the long term, but shorter term and up to now they have been brilliant!

Positives:
Extremely light and comfortable straight from the box. The foot is cradled perfectly at the ankle and coupled with the lacing system, a perfect fit can be achieved and they are comfortable every time. The foot is well cushioned and the sole stiffness is near perfect.

Negatives:
The crease across your toes will be a potential wear point, I'm not sure how robust the material will be over time and with wear.
The sole is not aggressive enough for me so leading to a tendency to be slippery over wet ground and it could do with being a little thicker for rocky terrain. This is the pay off for getting lightweight footwear I feel, but a price worth paying.

If they last 12 months, my usual benchmark, then they will be well worth the money.

UPDATE - final

Unfortunately these boots did not live up to the billing and ended up being a bit of a disappointment. They first started letting in water in September 2010 only 6 months after I got them. I persevered but they only ended up being completely useless by the end of the year and as predicted, the crease across the toes has worn through already.

Great boots in theory but long term it's a thumbs down and now I'm back on the hunt for a decent pair!

 

 

 

All pictures copyright © www.lovethelakes.net 2003-2011